Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The geographic distribution of pharmacies reflects interactions between population needs, economic viability, professional regulation, and healthcare development. Historical analysis can clarify how territorial inequalities in pharmaceutical provision emerged. Methods: This retrospective historical study reconstructed the pharmacy network in Bihor before 1920 using archival records, contemporary pharmaceutical yearbooks, historical statistics, and published studies. Oradea was analysed separately from the extra-urban county territory. Independent establishments were distinguished from relocations and dependent units, and temporal, geographic, and population-to-pharmacy indicators were calculated and interpreted descriptively. Results: Outside Oradea, 31 historical pharmacy entries were identified between 1798 and 1915; 28 were independent establishments, two were relocations, and one was a dependent branch. Nineteen of the 28 independent establishments (67.9%) appeared after 1880, and 23 (82.1%) represented first pharmacies in previously unserved localities. By the end of the analysed period, pharmacy provision remained markedly more concentrated in Oradea than in the extra-urban territory. Conclusions: Pharmacy development in Bihor followed a centre–periphery pattern characterised by early urban concentration, delayed territorial diffusion, and selective local intensification, illustrating a lasting tension between economic viability and equitable geographical access to pharmacy services. The findings show that the numerical expansion of a pharmacy network does not by itself ensure equitable access, a challenge that remains relevant to contemporary pharmacy regulation and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pasca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: