Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives Ultrasound assessment of superficial cervical lymph nodes is clinically valuable, yet current diagnostic methods are highly operator-dependent, with limited objectivity and consistency. This study investigates a more objective approach for analyzing lymph node ultrasound images, focusing on the stability and practical applicability of different model architectures on real-world clinical data. It aims to evaluate the utility of deep learning models for detection and segmentation of superficial lymph nodes and to provide a feasible methodology for objective lymph node ultrasound analysis. Methods Using real-world clinical data, a cervical lymph node ultrasound image dataset comprising 1,050 patients was constructed, with histopathological confirmation and standardized clinical-imaging follow-up (≥50 % diameter reduction over 6–9 months after treatment) serving as reference standards. Three different models – transformer-based RF-DETR, two-stage YOLO11+MedSAM, and end-to-end YOLO11-Seg – were systematically compared on detection and segmentation tasks within the same dataset. Results YOLO11-Seg demonstrated superior performance in both detection and segmentation. Under COCO evaluation metrics, it achieved an mean average precision (mAP) at 0.5 of 0.795 and an mAP at 0.5:0.95 of 0.558. Pixel-level segmentation evaluation yielded a Dice coefficient of 0.775 ± 0.15 and an IoU of 0.645 ± 0.15, with Precision and Recall values of 0.796 and 0.783, respectively. In contrast, the two-stage YOLO11+MedSAM and Transformer-based models exhibited lower accuracy and reduced consistency. Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence for the application of deep learning–based methods in lymph node ultrasound analysis and suggests a potential technical framework for generating structured imaging data, which may support future computer-assisted assessment pending further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: