Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Correctional healthcare is delivered at the intersection of two institutional mandates: protection of health and maintenance of custody and security. This commentary develops an experience-based operational re-engineering model for prison healthcare, building on the Italian transition of penitentiary medicine to the National Health Service (NHS) and on direct executive management within a Prison Medical Center. Rather than proposing a new regulatory architecture, the model translates existing legal, ethical, and clinical-governance requirements into operational processes. Particular attention is given to the practical implementation of Article 11 of the Italian Penitentiary Law, equivalence of care and Essential Levels of Care, informed consent and treatment refusal, clinical risk management, medication governance, electronic traceability, dedicated clinical pathways, telemedicine, gender-responsive care, and continuity at transfer or release. The central organizational premise is that the healthcare-custody interface should be governed through shared procedures, explicit responsibilities, and auditable clinical documentation, while preserving clinical independence and patient autonomy. The proposed framework is intended as an adaptable, experience-informed operational model that may support improvements in safety, appropriateness, continuity, accountability, and equity in correctional healthcare, including in other jurisdictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: