Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Public transit networks are critical to urban systems, yet aligning fixed bus services with dynamic and spatially heterogeneous passenger demand remains challenging. This study develops a network-based framework to compare passenger demand and bus service from a community-structure perspective. Both networks are formulated within a directed weighted degree-corrected mixed-membership model. Community memberships are estimated through co-clustering based on mixed simplex and cone geometry, and a directed weighted overlapping modularity determines a common community resolution. Applying the framework to Nanjing’s bus network reveals organisational differences, directional asymmetry, and station-level alignment. Despite broadly similar spatial distributions, demand communities are relatively continuous, block-like, and polycentric, whereas bus service communities are more concentrated and corridor-oriented, reflecting route organisation and infrastructure constraints. These findings provide a basis for understanding how passenger demand and bus service differ in their network organisation, with implications for bus network planning and service adjustment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
尚 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: