Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) enables fabrication of geometrically complex components but faces process-induced defects that undermine quality consistency. The digital twin (DT) paradigm, a synchronised virtual counterpart of the physical process, offers a powerful framework for intelligent closed-loop quality assurance. However, MAM-DT’s full potential is limited by the divide between its two foundational modelling approaches: physics-based models offer accuracy but are computationally prohibitive for real-time use, while data-driven models are fast yet require extensive data and lack physical interpretability. Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) emerges as the pivotal technology for their fusion. This review first elaborates a four-layer MAM-DT system architecture. It then critically examines the virtual twin’s two pillars: accelerated physics-based and surrogate modelling, and data-driven in-situ monitoring and control, highlighting their limitations. The core contribution is a systematic taxonomy and analysis of PIML methodologies, categorised as Physics-Augmented Data, Physics-Constrained Learning, and Physics-Guided Architecture, which serve as the core fusion engine for MAM-DT. Their principles, applications in MAM, and roles in enhancing generalizability, data efficiency, and physical plausibility are detailed. Finally, the paper concludes with a critical discussion of current challenges and future research directions, outlining a path toward autonomous, self-optimizing, trustworthy intelligent manufacturing systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: