Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Daily water-level changes in alpine closed lakes integrate lake-surface exchange, cryosphere processes, basin storage, and runoff routing, yet fixed calendar seasons and synchronous predictors may mix contrasting hydrological states and misalign antecedent forcing. This study developed a Hydro-Lag framework for Qinghai Lake, China’s largest inland lake, during 2014–2023 to improve daily reconstruction and driver attribution through dynamic hydrological process periods and time-lag effects. Satellite altimetry, optical and thermal imagery, hydrometeorological reanalysis, lake ice, and runoff data were integrated with water-balance constraints. The frozen (T1) and ablation (T2) periods were identified from lake ice transitions and a positive degree-day (PDD) threshold estimated from ice thickness. Meanwhile, basin wetness, represented by the antecedent precipitation index (API), distinguished the wet (T3) and dry (T4) periods. Candidate lags from cross-correlation analysis were refined through repeated cross-validation and used in an ensemble of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and ExtraTrees; cross-fitted predictions were interpreted with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Alignments differed markedly: selected core variables in T1 aligned mainly at 10–12 days; T2 used 1–2 days runoff, soil-moisture, and evapotranspiration offsets together with a same-day 14-day M_snow accumulation; T3 runoff and soil moisture at 3–5 days and precipitation-related variables at 8–9 days; and T4 antecedent basin variables at 11–24 days. Against an independently tuned SeasonRAW baseline, Hydro-Lag increased test R2 from 0.551 to 0.793 and reduced RMSE from 14.26 to 8.51 mm d−1. OOF SHAP indicated period-dependent patterns in modeled predictor contributions: mixed contributions in T1, wetness–storage emphasis in T2–T3, and antecedent storage and thermo-evaporative contributions in T4. Conditional responses showed thresholds and sign reversals across thermal, wetness, and event-magnitude gradients. The framework provides a process-aware basis for assessing daily lake–basin interactions in data-sparse alpine closed basins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: