Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solar wind forcing and magnetospheric evolution contribute to the timing of geomagnetic disturbances. A central question is how estimated response lags depend on the chosen observable and preprocessing. We analyzed eight selected intervals of one-minute OMNI observations using multivariate covariance-based response estimates for the symmetric disturbance index in the horizontal component (SYM-H). The state contains electric field, dynamic pressure, and index levels at the current time and four preceding samples. Causal exponential high-pass filtering defines the primary analysis. Within a 0–40 min search window, the electric-field response of SYM-H increments has a median eventwise peak lag of 20 min and an interquartile range (IQR) of 10.5 min; its ensemble-mean curve peaks at 35 min. The pressure response peaks at 4 min in both summaries. Individual increment-response peak lags are unchanged across four preprocessing schemes at common timestamps. Extending the search to 120 min shifts the electric-field median to 41 min, while ensemble peaks remain at 35 and 4 min. These descriptive estimates are consistent with rapid compressive and slower convective contributions, but window dependence, model approximation, and interpolated inputs limit their interpretation as physical transport delays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: