Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Accurate assessment of physical activity is crucial for public health surveillance; however, the psychometric properties of the adapted Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-AR) remain understudied in community-based Egyptian populations, creating a gap in local health monitoring tools. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the GPAQ-AR in Egyptian adults. Methods This cross-sectional validation study with a two-week follow-up included 151 healthy adults (76 males, 75 females) from Egypt. To assess test-retest reliability, the GPAQ-AR was administered on two occasions, two weeks apart. Criterion validity was evaluated by comparing the GPAQ-AR and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (IPAQ-SF) against average daily step counts from a pedometer worn for seven consecutive days. Results The GPAQ-AR showed high test-retest consistency for both males [ r = .840–.991, 95% CI (.758, .994)] and females [ r = .686–.980, 95% CI (.544, .987)]. It demonstrated excellent absolute agreement for total energy expenditure (males: ICC = .933; females: ICC = .898). High convergence was found with the subjective IPAQ-SF for both males [ r = .896, 95% CI (.857, .925)] and females [ r = .907, 95% CI (.872, .933)]. However, its association with objective pedometer data was weak, showing no significant correlation for males [ r = .005, 95% CI (−.155, .164)] and a significant but weak negative correlation for females [ r = −.257, 95% CI (−.398, −.101)]. The GPAQ-AR yielded substantially higher estimates of physical activity volume than could be captured by ambulatory step counts. Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence that the GPAQ-AR demonstrates high test-retest but shows limited association with objective ambulatory activity. Due to the construct mismatch between total reported energy expenditure and ambulatory steps, the GPAQ-AR is more suitable for ranking individuals' physical activity levels than for determining absolute energy expenditure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aly et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: