Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gaining control over chromophore‐functionalized multicomponent architectures sets the stage to construct modular libraries of tunable emitters, light‐harvesting complexes, and photo‐redox catalysts. Based on a “Shape Complementary Assembly” (SCA) approach, we report two luminescent heteroleptic coordination cages built from Pd(II) cations, a diketopyrrolopyrrole ligand ( L A ) and matching counter ligands with either a fluorenone ( L 1 ) or carbazole ( L 2 ) π‐system. Transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy reveals an energy transfer from either L 1 or L 2 to L A , however, only for cage Pd 2 L A 2 L 1 2 do the TA data show a subsequent (re)population of L 1 ‐centered (triplet) states, which we attribute to an intra‐assembly excitation back‐transfer from L A to L 1 , accompanied by a prolonged overall excited‐state lifetime. Computations suggest that different extents of vibrational relaxation of the donors’ S 1 states enable excitation back‐transfer in only one of the two cages and propose a Förster‐type mechanism for it, indicating that the energy‐transfer pathway can be selected through the choice of the co‐ligand. As a nanosized cage, this system allows guest molecules to be closely bound within an outer shell of photoactive ligands. Hence, the encapsulation of a chiral guest bestows both cages with circular dichroism (CD) and circularly polarized luminescence (CPL).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regeni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: