Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Objectives: Eco-anxiety is a growing psychological response to climate change, but individual vulnerability factors remain poorly understood. Affective temperaments may contribute to differences in eco-anxiety. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional online study involved 209 Italian adults recruited between May and December 2024. Participants completed the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale and the short version TEMPS-A. Gender differences were assessed using independent-sample t-tests, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between affective temperaments and eco-anxiety dimensions. Results: Regression models explained 16–22% of variance. Anxious temperament was the most consistent correlate, associating with affective symptoms, rumination, behavioural symptoms, and personal-impact anxiety. Cyclothymic temperament was associated with behavioural symptoms and personal-impact anxiety, but not rumination after correction for multiple testing. Other temperaments showed no significant associations. Females reported higher anxious temperament and personal-impact anxiety. After adjustment for age and gender, associations with personal-impact anxiety did not survive correction for multiple testing. Conclusions: Findings suggest that individual differences in eco-anxiety are associated with affective temperament, although the cross-sectional design and partial overlap between measures call for caution. Considering temperament may improve understanding of psychological responses to climate change and inform future preventive and support strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lombardo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: