Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate bearing diagnosis requires informative vibration representations and reliable confidence estimates. Fixed evidence sets and independent fragment processing can overlook signal-dependent features and record-level relationships. This paper proposes a fragment-aware evidence large language model (FAE-LLM) that combines adaptive physical-evidence acquisition with trustworthy record-level fusion. A learned policy uses time-domain descriptors and waveform features to select spectral, envelope-spectrum, or autocorrelation evidence. Continuous projections map the selected evidence into a partially fine-tuned GPT-2 backbone. An order-aware relational transformer captures dependencies among adjacent fragments, and Dirichlet fusion integrates their evidence according to uncertainty and conflict. A validation-based rejection rule defers uncertain predictions. Across five runs, FAE-LLM achieves classification accuracies of 100 . 00 % on XJTU-SY and 96 . 35 % on GDUPT, with all GDUPT comparison methods receiving 4096-point records. Ablation studies show the benefit of longer record context, while fusion controls demonstrate improved probability calibration. The framework connects physical signal analysis with record-aware classification and selective decision support for bearing fault diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: