Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Federated learning (FL) supports collaborative edge intelligence without centralizing raw data, but non-IID data, Byzantine attacks, and limited client energy complicate IoT deployment. We study two complementary server-side mechanisms: TEA-FL, which couples consistency-based trust with residual energy in client selection and aggregation, and ARL-FL, which separates risk/lifetime-aware scheduling from pressure-adaptive robust aggregation. A matched two-domain protocol distinguishes full-system PAMAP2 evidence from aggregation-focused CICIoT2023 evidence and combines fold/seed-level inference with ablations, targeted sensitivities, and complete-round overhead measurements. Under the primary simulated resource model, TEA-FL achieved the highest overall PAMAP2 Macro-F1 and lowest normalized energy, but reduced participation fairness and did not complete every nominal-horizon run. ARL-FL preserved the largest active-client population and completed all PAMAP2 runs, but failed under the strongest sign-flip attack. Focused controls showed that trust drives TEA-FL’s sign-flip robustness, energy-aware selection drives ARL-FL’s sustainability benefit, and simpler fixed clipping-plus-trimming can be competitive under strong attack. The results support context-dependent robustness–sustainability trade-offs rather than universal superiority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: