Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CO 2 capture and conversion offer a promising route to reduce emissions and support a circular carbon economy. However, conventional CO 2 regeneration typically relies on temperature- or pressure-swing processes, which can limit rapid and dynamically operated capture–conversion systems. In this work, we develop an integrated CO 2 capture–desorption–conversion approach that combines low-temperature CO 2 physisorption on ZSM-5 with plasma-assisted regeneration and in situ conversion in a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor. Upon plasma ignition, pre-adsorbed CO 2 was rapidly released and simultaneously converted to CO without external heating during the plasma-assisted regeneration stage. Total CO 2 desorption fractions of 81.4–85.3% were achieved, compared with approximately 40–47% during physical desorption by Ar purging alone. CO 2 desorption and conversion were strongly dependent on adsorption temperature, discharge power, and Ar flow rate. Notably, increasing discharge power promoted CO 2 desorption but reduced CO 2 conversion, whereas increasing the Ar flow rate enhanced CO 2 conversion with only a minor influence on total desorption. In situ plasma-coupled Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed the formation of monodentate and bidentate carbonate species during plasma exposure. Together with the transient CO 2 and CO profiles, these observations suggest two concurrent routes for CO formation: rapid gas-phase activation of desorbed CO 2 and a possible slower surface-mediated pathway involving carbonate species. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of coupling CO 2 capture, electrically driven sorbent regeneration, and conversion within a single plasma–sorbent system, offering a flexible approach to integrated carbon capture and utilization (ICCU).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaffar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: