Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective. Functional connectivity analysis of fMRI data provides critical insight into large-scale brain organization; however, conventional approaches often ignore the specific information mixed with population-level structure and individual- or condition-specific variability. We aimed to develop an interpretable framework that separates these shared and heterogeneous components of the human functional connectome. Approach. We developed Joint Individual Graph Learning (JIGL), a multi-view graph learning framework that jointly estimates a low-rank common graph and sparse view-specific graphs across subjects or experimental conditions. We evaluated JIGL using resting-state and task-based fMRI data from 422 individuals across eight conditions and compared it with Pearson correlation, SIMLR (CIMLR), and Simplex. Performance was assessed using alignment with established resting-state network organization, associations with age and cognitive phenotypes, task identifiability, and low-dimensional representations of task-specific connectivity. Main results. The common graph learned by JIGL captured a biologically meaningful functional backbone and showed stronger alignment with established resting-state network organization than the comparison methods. JIGL-derived individual graphs preserved biologically relevant inter-individual variability, yielding stronger associations with age and cognitive phenotypes. The task-specific graphs also showed improved identifiability, as quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient. Furthermore, low-dimensional embeddings of the connectivity matrices revealed structured, network-dependent task signatures that were consistently distinct from both the common graph and the resting-state condition. Significance. JIGL provides a principled framework for disentangling shared functional architecture from individual- and condition-specific connectivity patterns. This decomposition improves sensitivity to biologically meaningful variability and supports more interpretable analyses of functional brain organization across individuals and cognitive states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: