Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Motor learning traditionally advocates for the superiority of an external attentional focus; however, its universality remains questioned across variations in other influential factors. This study examined the effects of internal vs. external attentional focus across two distinct motor tasks during short-term skill acquisition, long-term retention, and motor learning in primary school beginners aged 8–12 years ( n = 187, 98 males, 89 females; n = 100, 51 males, 49 females). The participants completed an 8-h golf course within their physical education curriculum during two consecutive academic years, separated by a long-term retention period (10–11 months). They were assigned to either an internal or external attentional focus group and performed two distinct tasks. Performance was tracked through pre- and post-tests for each of the two interventions and for each swing type (short-game and long-game swing). During short-term skill acquisition, a statistically significant Time × Focus interaction emerged for the short-game, F(1, 185) = 5.45, p = .021, η p 2 = .029, driven by greater performance improvements in the external focus group compared to the internal focus group. For the long-game, no statistically significant Time × Focus interaction was detected, F(1, 185) = 1.97, p = .163, η p 2 = .011. These findings indicate that attentional focus advantages were confined to short-term post-intervention skill acquisition for the short-game swing. The study did not detect a statistically significant difference in focus efficacy between swing types. Furthermore, initial gains tended to decay over extended non-practice intervals regardless of the attentional cue used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camacho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: