Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Batch 2's rung amplitude left one unowned factor: eps_rad, the fraction of the sever-as-shell's energy emerging as tensor radiation. Attacked at the dump-EOS address (P10-D-S2's sever mechanics), the answer is a boundary result: both owned tangential stresses are isotropic (route alpha S_ij = sigma h_ij, w_s = -1; the dump deposit at uniform tangential pressure p = 0, w_s = 0), and their transverse-traceless content in the plane is exactly zero (script-verified against an anisotropic control), so the anisotropy route to a quadrupole is closed at both owned addresses; the record owns no asphericity object; and for the exactly spherical sever eps_rad = 0 exactly (Birkhoff). eps_rad is therefore unowned in-family, proved at the owned addresses: any nonzero value factors as A^2 * eta_quad with A an unowned sever asphericity (the pair imbalance 11/411 and kappa* are censused and refused as candidates), and existing data already bound the product (A^2 eta_quad < 0.527 thin / < 0.0789 thick). Falsifiers pre-registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: