Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Canada provides publicly funded influenza vaccination for adults aged ≥65 years under universal healthcare, yet persistent coverage gaps remain. Existing research frequently conflates forms of primary-care fragmentation and rarely disentangles system-level and socioeconomic barriers to immunisation. This study examines vaccination inequities across primary-care continuity, inter-provider coordination, and socioeconomic dimensions among community-dwelling older Canadians. Methods Pooled 2015-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey data (n = 53,033 adults ≥65 years) were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 99% confidence intervals (CI); interaction terms and income-stratified analyses were deployed to test effect modification. Exposures encompassed usual source of care, provider attachment, care coordination, household income, and educational attainment. Results Overall vaccination uptake reached 60.9%. Hierarchical gradients of primary-care fragmentation were detected; absence of a regular provider constituted the strongest structural barrier (OR=0.45, 99%CI 0.40-0.50). Income-stratified analyses identified a buffering effect of community health centres (CHCs), whereby CHCs partially offset vaccination deficits for low-income older adults facing moderate care fragmentation. Independent socioeconomic gradients and declining uptake with worsening inter-provider coordination were also observed. Conclusions Despite zero-cost influenza vaccination in Canada, primary-care fragmentation and socioeconomic disadvantage are independently associated with immunisation inequities. Results support gradient-tailored system-level interventions and targeted investment in CHCs to potentially mitigate disparities for marginalised older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen Lin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: