Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computer software plays an essential role in sociological teaching. Core classes in research design, qualitative methods, and quantitative methods routinely rely on software applications to train students. In the literature on sociological teaching, there is surprisingly little analysis of the implications of software choices for our students. This essay encourages sociologists to adopt free and open-source software (FOSS) in our teaching and training. FOSS can help lessen inequalities in access to required course materials, ensure that students retain access to software postgraduation, and integrate well with a larger disciplinary emphasis on public and community-engaged sociology. Examples of FOSS are provided, including tools for citation and bibliographic management, qualitative methods, and quantitative methods. Logistical concerns about switching to FOSS are also discussed. I conclude by mentioning strengths and weaknesses of moving to FOSS for sociological teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick Rafail (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: