Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Depending on which historical moments they have inhabited, LGBT+ people aged 40 + may have experienced a combination of criminalisation, pathologisation, discrimination from within both cis-heterosexual spaces and LGBT+ spaces, and ongoing threats to inclusion through anti-LGBT+ speech. This paper draws on 38 life-course interviews with LGBT+ people aged 40 + conducted as part of the IncludeAge project (2022-27), which explores experiences of inclusion and exclusion in everyday places and online spaces. Our paper considers how LGBT+ people aged 40 + currently living in Britain construct forms of experiential wisdom by reflecting on lives shaped by exclusion and marginalisation. We argue that attention to these ‘life things’ offers a broader way of conceptualising what exchanges between LGBT+ people of different generational moments might look like, and how such exchanges might contribute to age-friendly places and spaces for LGBT+ people. Although our data cannot demonstrate bidirectional LGBT+ intergenerational exchange or its effects, it does suggest that ‘life things’ provide a useful way of conceptualising what might be exchanged: not simply historical knowledge from old to young, but experiential perspectives on the ordinary and difficult business of living.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vytniorgu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: