Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) aims to build the capacity of non-specialist healthcare workers (NSHWs) to deliver mental healthcare, including care for Child and Adolescent Mental and Behavioral Disorders (CAMBD). However, few studies have evaluated the mhGAP-IG CAMBD module. This study examined changes in NSHWs’ knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices following a contextualized mhGAP-IG CAMBD training in Kenya. A mixed-methods, pre-post implementation evaluation was conducted across 58 primary healthcare facilities. Knowledge and attitudes data were collected at baseline, immediately post-training, and three months post-training. Interviews with six supervisors and five focus group discussions with 60 NSHWs explored perceived changes in competencies and clinical practice. A six-month follow-up survey further explored NSHWs’ experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and pooled mixed-effects models, and qualitative data analyzed thematically. Knowledge scores increased from baseline (M = 23.07, SD = 3.68) to post-training (M = 25.57, SD = 3.35; p<.001) and remained stable at three-month follow-up (M = 25.53, SD = 3.38). Attitude scores decreased from pre-training (M = 34.40, SD = 8.87) to post-training (M = 28.00, SD = 9.70; p<.001), with no changes between post-training and follow-up (p=.67). NSHWs reported improved confidence in identifying and managing CAMBD and increased integration of mental health into routine care. At six months, among the 37 (39.8% response rate), 94.5% reported continued routine CAMBD screening; about half (51.4%) reported frequent use of the CAMBD module; however, limited supervision and health system constraints persisted. The CAMBD training increased knowledge, reduced stigma, and improved self-reported practices, preliminarily suggesting that a contextualized CAMBD module may help strengthen care, inform policy, and scale up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mkubwa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: