Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Delta-T Compressional (DTC) well logs provide important sonic information for formation evaluation and subsurface characterization, but incomplete or unavailable sonic-log measurements can limit subsequent interpretation. This study evaluates six supervised machine-learning models Multiple Linear Regression, SGD Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest, and XGBoost for DTC log reconstruction using well-log data from the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. The dataset was cleaned, depth-aligned, and divided into an 80% training set and a 20% internal test set. Three independent wells were reserved for blind testing. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using randomized search with 2-fold cross-validation for the selected nonlinear models. On the internal test dataset, Random Forest achieved the highest R2 of 0.96, followed by KNN and XGBoost, both with an R2 of 0.93. Independent blind testing showed that model performance varied between wells. SGD achieved an R2 of 0.85 for Trapper-A1, XGBoost achieved 0.71 for Ahuroa South B-1, and MLP achieved 0.81 for Kahili-1C. MLP and XGBoost showed relatively better performance across the independent wells. The predicted DTC profiles reproduced the overall trends of the observed logs, although larger deviations occurred in some depth intervals. An uncertainty analysis based on MLP P5–P95 prediction intervals showed empirical coverage of 33.30%, 25.31%, and 29.32% for the three blind-test wells, indicating that the estimated uncertainty intervals were narrower than the observed prediction variability. The proposed workflow can support DTC reconstruction in wells with incomplete or unavailable sonic-log measurements and may provide useful input for formation evaluation, geomechanical analysis, and hole-cleaning studies. Further validation using additional wells and improved uncertainty-calibration methods is required before broader application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patidar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: