Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Diabetes mellitus requires sustained self-management, yet outcomes are strongly influenced by social determinants. In low- and middle-income settings such as Ghana, limited evidence exists on how these determinants shape diabetes self-management at the municipal level. Objective This study examined the association between social determinants of health on diabetes self-management among adults with diabetes in Bolgatanga Municipality, Ghana. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 305 adults with type 2 diabetes selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Diabetes self-management was assessed using a 16-item Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire, with each participant’s mean score calculated across the 16 items. The sample mean score of 3.01 was used as a reference point; participants scoring above 3.01 were classified as having better diabetes self-management, while those scoring at or below 3.01 were classified as having poorer self-management. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and self-management practices. Associations were assessed using chi-square tests, while multivariable binary logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with diabetes self-management. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Participants were predominantly middle-aged (33.1%), female (56.4%), and married (61.0%), with 34.1% attaining tertiary education. Overall, 47.9% had better diabetes self-management, while 52.1% had poorer self-management. Multivariable logistic regression showed that widowed participants had lower odds of better self-management than single participants (AOR = 0.236, 95% CI: 0.058–0.966; p = 0.045). Participants without health insurance also had lower odds of better self-management (AOR = 0.096, 95% CI: 0.032–0.282; p < 0.001). High transportation costs (AOR = 3.522, 95% CI: 1.673–7.413; p = 0.001) and long waiting times (AOR = 2.893, 95% CI: 1.459–5.734; p = 0.002) were associated with higher odds of better self-management, while lack of staff (AOR = 0.416, 95% CI: 0.222–0.781; p = 0.006) and frequent forgetfulness due to busy schedules (AOR = 0.172, 95% CI: 0.031–0.953; p = 0.044) were associated with lower odds of better self-management. Conclusion Diabetes self-management remains suboptimal and is shaped by socioeconomic and behavioural determinants. Strengthening financial protection, service delivery efficiency, and adherence support systems is essential for improved outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adongo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: