Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines the integration of the Deep Learning curriculum with Javanese cultural values in teaching science fiction writing to high school students. The study is motivated by the importance of developing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) competencies integrated with the strengthening of cultural identity in the era of globalization. A mixed methods research approach was applied involving 30 students and 2 Indonesian language teachers at SMA Negeri 9 Malang. Data were collected through structured observations, semi-structured interviews, and analysis of student work documents using rubrics developed based on the 6C's dimensions of Deep Learning (Critical Thinking, Creativity, Collaboration, Communication, Character, Citizenship). The research results revealed that the integration successfully actualized all dimensions of Deep Learning at a high level (scores of 4.3-4.8 on a 5-point scale), with the highest achievements in the Collaboration (4.8) and Creativity (4.7) dimensions. Qualitative analysis of student work identified five patterns of Javanese cultural integration, namely: (1) integration of technology with Javanese philosophy, (2) technology as an optimizer of local wisdom, (3) mythology as the basis of technology, (4) collaborative resolution of generational conflicts, and (5) culture as a value system regulating technology. As many as 55% of student works reached the very good category, showing a significant improvement in aspects of creativity and cultural integration. The research conclusion states that the integration of the Deep Learning curriculum with Javanese cultural values not only improves technical competence in writing science fiction but also develops contextual scientific literacy and strengthens students' cultural identity. This model represents a transformative synthesis between global education paradigms and local wisdom relevant to the Indonesian educational context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santoso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: