This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Emergency gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is associated with substantial postoperative morbidity and mortality. Local outcome audits can identify high-risk presentations and opportunities to improve perioperative care. Aim: To describe the clinical profile and outcomes of patients undergoing emergency GI surgery and assess associations between selected clinical and operative variables and mortality. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the emergency surgery service of a tertiary care hospital over 18 months. One hundred patients aged 18–65 years undergoing emergency GI surgery were included after consent. Demographic, clinical, operative and postoperative variables were recorded, with follow-up for 30 days. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation. Associations were assessed using chi-square and between-group tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 42.92 ± 14.8 years; 49 patients (49%) were male and 51 (51%) female. Appendicitis was the most common diagnosis (54%), followed by intestinal perforation (29%), intestinal obstruction (13%) and blunt abdominal trauma (4%). Peritoneal contamination was recorded in 49% and multiple procedures in 24%. Postoperative complications occurred in 21%; wound infection was the most frequent (12%), followed by wound dehiscence (5%), renal failure (2%) and respiratory failure (2%). Overall mortality was 10%. Mortality differed significantly by diagnosis, multiple procedures and postoperative complications (each reported p < 0.01). Conclusion: In this single-centre cohort, emergency GI surgery was associated with 21% postoperative morbidity and 10% mortality. Diagnosis at presentation, the need for multiple procedures and postoperative complications were associated with mortality. These findings support careful risk assessment, prompt definitive treatment and structured postoperative surveillance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mhatre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: