This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) enables contactless heart-rate estimation from facialvideo, but individual measurements can become unreliable under motion, illumination variation,and signal contamination [1], [2], [3]. Existing methods have explored chrominance-based,projection-based, and blind-source-separation approaches, while sparse spectral peak trackinghas been investigated for robust pulse-rate estimation [4], [5], [6], [7]. However, accurateestimation alone does not indicate whether a measurement should be trusted. This paper presentsPULSEGUARD, a reliability-oriented framework that augments rPPG heart-rate estimationwith signal-quality assessment, uncertainty quantification, failure-cause diagnosis, and selectiveprediction. PULSEGUARD combines six rPPG methods—Green, CHROM, POS, PCA, ICA,and LGI—through adaptive quality-weighted spectral fusion [1], [4], [5], [6], [8], [9]. Aseven-component Physiological Signal Quality Index (PSQI) characterizes spectral quality,cross-method agreement, motion, illumination, region-of-interest stability, temporal consistency,and harmonic coherence. The framework additionally estimates heart-rate uncertainty, diagnosesnine failure conditions, and assigns each measurement a REPORT, CAUTION, or ABSTAINoutcome. PULSEGUARD is evaluated on a controlled synthetic physiological video datasetcontaining normal and challenging conditions, including motion, illumination changes, occlusion,compression, resolution reduction, and frame-rate variation. Evaluation includes heart-rateaccuracy, Bland–Altman analysis, uncertainty calibration, failure detection, ablation analysis, andrisk–coverage evaluation [10]. Comparison of always-predict and selective-abstention strategiesshows that higher PSQI is associated with lower estimation error and that abstaining fromlow-reliability measurements reduces error on the accepted subset. The results demonstratethe potential of explicitly modeling measurement reliability for more trustworthy contactlessphysiological monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nifla Nalakath (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: