Key result
Khat-effective AMI onset shows no circadian excess but is linked to more acute heart failure and shock.
Why the study?
The circadian pattern of AMI symptom onset among habitual khat chewers and differences in clinical presentation, angiographic findings, and in-hospital outcomes according to periods of active khat exposure warranted investigation.
Does AMI symptom onset during the khat-effective period (15:00–00:00) increase in-hospital complications and alter clinical presentation compared to the khat-inactive period (00:01–14:59) in habitual khat chewers presenting with AMI?
Cohort (n=200)
No
Does AMI symptom onset during the khat-effective period (15:00–00:00) increase in-hospital complications and alter clinical presentation compared to the khat-inactive period (00:01–14:59) in habitual khat chewers presenting with AMI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Among habitual khat chewers presenting with acute myocardial infarction, symptom onset during the active khat-exposure period (15:00–00:00) is associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock despite similar baseline and angiographic profiles.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the circadian pattern of AMI symptom onset among habitual khat chewers and to evaluate differences in clinical presentation, angiographic findings, and in-hospital outcomes according to periods of active khat exposure. Methodology: This prospective observational study enrolled 200 consecutive habitual khat chewers with confirmed AMI who were admitted to the Cardiac Center of Al-Thawra General Teaching Hospital, Sana’a, Yemen, between January and September 2024. Symptom onset times were analyzed across the 24-hour cycle and categorized into a khat-inactive period (00:01–14:59) and a khat-effective period (15:00–00:00). Results: AMI symptom onset demonstrated a non-uniform circadian distribution, with clustering during the early morning and late evening/night hours. Of the 200 participants, 109 (54.5%) experienced symptom onset during the khat-effective period and 91 (45.5%) during the khat-inactive period, with no significant difference in overall distribution (p = 0.203). Baseline demographic, clinical, behavioral, and angiographic characteristics were largely comparable between groups. However, acute heart failure occurred significantly more frequently among patients presenting during the khat-effective period than among those presenting during the khat-inactive period (14.7% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.035). Similarly, cardiogenic shock was more common during the khat-effective period (12.8% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.006). No independent clinical or behavioral predictors of symptom onset during the khat-effective period were identified in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Among habitual khat chewers, AMI symptom onset exhibited a distinctive circadian pattern characterized by clustering during the early morning and late evening/night hours. Although the overall distribution of events did not differ significantly between khat activity periods, symptom onset during the khat-effective period was associated with a higher incidence of acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Zakari et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=200). AMI symptom onset during khat-effective period (15:00-00:00) vs. AMI symptom onset during khat-inactive period (00:01-14:59) was evaluated on Distribution of AMI symptom onset between khat-effective (15:00-00:00) and khat-inactive (00:01-14:59) periods (p=0.203). Symptom onset during the khat-effective period showed no overall circadian excess (54.5% vs 45.5%, p=0.203) but increased acute heart failure (14.7% vs 5.5%, p=0.035) and shock (12.8% vs 2.2%, p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: