Key result
Ambulatory 24-h PWV correlates substantially better with fitness-corrected exercise SBP than uncorrected SBP.
Why the study?
Brachial waveform-derived pulse wave velocity (PWV) is underused due to concerns about age and SBP dependence, and single-point office PWV may not adequately represent the dynamic vascular load driving exercise blood pressure response. Furthermore, adjusting exercise SBP for cardiorespiratory fitness may refine its interpretation.
Does 24-h ambulatory waveform-derived pulse wave velocity better predict fitness-corrected exercise blood pressure response compared to single-point office pulse wave velocity in adults with controlled blood pressure?
Cross-Sectional (n=228)
Does 24-h ambulatory waveform-derived pulse wave velocity better predict fitness-corrected exercise blood pressure response compared to single-point office pulse wave velocity in adults with controlled blood pressure?
Ambulatory 24-h brachial waveform-derived pulse wave velocity independently predicts exercise blood pressure response, especially when exercise systolic blood pressure is indexed to cardiorespiratory fitness (peak VO2).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice for exercise BP assessment; extends observational links between ambulatory PWV and fitness-indexed responses.
OBJECTIVES: Exercise blood pressure response (EBPR) is influenced by arterial stiffness, reflected by pulse wave velocity (PWV). Adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness may refine its interpretation. Brachial waveform-derived PWV remains underused due to concerns about age and SBP dependence, and single-point office PWV may inadequately represent the dynamic vascular load driving EBPR. We hypothesized that 24-h PWV would outperform office PWV in predicting EBPR, and that indexing exercise SBP to aerobic fitness would strengthen these associations. METHODS: We studied 228 adults (46% men; age 53 ± 12 years) with adequately controlled blood pressure, irrespective of hypertension diagnosis. Individuals with coronary artery disease, valvular disease, or heart failure were excluded. All participants underwent office and 24-h blood pressure monitoring with integrated pulse wave analysis (Mobil-O-Graph), cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and echocardiography. Exercise SBP at submaximal and peak workloads was normalized to peak oxygen uptake (VO2). RESULTS: Fitness-corrected SBP showed stronger associations with PWV than uncorrected values (r = 0.64 vs. 0.15; P < 0.001). Both submaximal and peak SBP indexed to peak VO2 increased stepwise across 24-h PWV tertiles; this gradient was attenuated without fitness correction. After adjustment for age, sex, SBP, BMI, and left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction, 24-h PWV remained an independent predictor of fitness-corrected EBPR, whereas office PWV was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Brachial BP-waveform-derived PWV independently predicts EBPR. Ambulatory 24-h PWV demonstrates stronger associations with exercise BP behaviour compared with single-time-point office PWV, and fitness-corrected SBP outperforms conventional uncorrected measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zachwyc et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Adults with adequately controlled blood pressure (n=228). Ambulatory 24-h brachial waveform-derived pulse wave velocity (PWV) vs. Single-point office pulse wave velocity (PWV) and uncorrected exercise SBP was evaluated on Exercise blood pressure response (EBPR) normalized to peak oxygen uptake (VO2) (r = 0.64 vs. 0.15, p=<0.001). Ambulatory 24-h pulse wave velocity independently predicted fitness-corrected exercise SBP, which correlated more strongly with PWV than uncorrected SBP (r=0.64 vs 0.15; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: