Key result
First-generation immigrant status linked to ~16% higher risk of ischemic heart disease vs. Swedish-born individuals.
Why the study?
With an increasingly diverse immigrant population in Sweden and rising cardiovascular disease risk factors in many countries of origin, understanding disparities in ischemic heart disease among immigrants and their descendants has become increasingly important.
Does immigrant status (by country of origin, duration of residence, and generation) influence the incidence of first-time ischemic heart disease compared with Swedish-born individuals in Sweden?
Cohort (n=8,536,717)
Yes
Does immigrant status (by country of origin, duration of residence, and generation) influence the incidence of first-time ischemic heart disease compared with Swedish-born individuals in Sweden?
First-generation immigrants in Sweden—especially recent arrivals with 5–15 years of residence and those from the Middle East, South Asia, and Nordic countries—face a significantly elevated risk of incident ischemic heart disease that challenges the classical healthy-migrant hypothesis and warrants targeted early cardiovascular prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform early risk assessment in recent immigrants; challenges healthy-migrant hypothesis and extends migration-CVD research.
As Sweden’s immigrant population has become increasingly diverse and many countries of origin have undergone an epidemiological transition with rising cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, understanding disparities in ischemic heart disease (IHD) among immigrants and their descendants has become increasingly important. This nationwide registry-based cohort study included over 8.5 million individuals aged 35–85 years [50.1% women; 18.2% first-generation (G1) and 9.4% second-generation (G2) immigrants] who followed from 1993 to mid-2023. Adjusted Cox regression models were used to examine associations between migrant-related factors—including country of origin, duration of residence, period of immigration, and immigrant generation—and first-time IHD incidence. During follow-up, 703 212 first-time IHD events occurred. Compared with Swedish-born individuals, G1 immigrants from the Nordic countries, the Middle East, and selected Asian countries (Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka), as well as G2 individuals with Finnish parental origin, had a higher risk of IHD. The highest risks were observed among recent immigrants from the Middle East and among immigrants with the shortest duration of residence. Risk generally declined with increasing duration of residence and became lower than that of the reference population in many immigrant groups. Although age-standardized IHD incidence rates declined over the past three decades, the pace of decline varied across immigrant groups and was slowest among Asian immigrants. In conclusion, most immigrant groups, particularly recent immigrants from the Middle East and immigrants with the shortest duration of residence, had a higher risk of IHD. Tailored cardiovascular prevention strategies are essential to reduce these disparities among immigrants in Sweden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tollosa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart disease (IHD) (n=8,536,717). First-generation (G1) and second-generation (G2) immigrant status (stratified by country of origin, duration of residence, and immigration period) vs. Swedish-born individuals (including G2 for G1 comparisons; native Swedes with two Swedish-born parents for G2 comparisons) was evaluated on First-time recorded diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD; ICD-9 410-414, ICD-10 I20-I25) (HR 1.16 in G1 women (HR 1.14 in G1 men), 95% CI 1.14-1.17). First-generation immigrants in Sweden had a higher risk of first-time ischemic heart disease than Swedish-born individuals (HR 1.16 in women; HR 1.14 in men), peaking at 5-15 years of residence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: