Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Membrane technologies are widely used in ethanol removal from wine (DW); however, they face challenges in maintaining wine quality, particularly in retaining volatile compounds. This study evaluated for the first time a two-stage membrane process (PV-NF) combining pervaporation (PV) and dia-nanofiltration (dia-NF) to produce a white dealcoholized wine-based beverages (DW; ethanol <0.5% v /v) with aroma preservation. PV was first used to extract and recover aroma compounds from the original wine (OW). The resulting dearomatized wine underwent dia-NF for ethanol removal, after which the recovered aroma concentrate was reconstituted into the final DW, ensuring its alcohol content did not exceed 0.5% v /v. Additionally, the physicochemical, color, and volatile profiles of the produced DWs were studied. The results indicated that total acidity and volatile acidity were reduced by 80–82% and 35–52%, respectively. Furthermore, reducing sugars, glycerin, malic acid, and tartaric acid experienced partial depletion, while citric acid was completely lost. Color profiles were also impacted; the extended processing time of the combined PV-NF approach, elevating the browning index (Abs 420 nm) to as high as 0.71 AU compared to the OW (0.07 AU). The PV-NF process successfully produced DW with ethanol content below 0.5% v /v while retaining 27–31% of total aroma compounds, outperforming NF alone (6–9% retention). These findings highlight the potential of combining PV-NF to mitigate volatile losses during the process and stress the need for optimizing processing strategies to balance ethanol reduction with sensory integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: