Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), recipient molecular testing may inadvertently characterize donor-derived hematopoiesis in patients with donor-predominant chimerism. Existing donor-disclosure frameworks provide guidance once donor origin is suspected, but less guidance exists for the clinical and laboratory steps needed to interpret, report, and manage post-transplant molecular findings that may reflect donor hematopoiesis. We present two cases illustrating these challenges. In a patient with acute myeloid leukemia, a DDX41 variant of uncertain significance was detected at germline-level variant allele frequency during donor-predominant chimerism and was absent from pre-transplant recipient testing, supporting probable donor origin. In a patient with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia and myeloid lineage switch, a DNMT3A variant distinct from the recipient’s original mutation was identified at low variant allele frequency following donor engraftment, suggesting clonal hematopoiesis of possible donor origin. These cases demonstrate that post-transplant molecular findings require integration of chimerism status, prior recipient molecular data, variant characteristics, and donor-recipient context. They also highlight a bidirectional disclosure problem in which donor-origin interpretation may be necessary to avoid misclassifying a result as recipient-derived, while discussion of donor origin with the recipient may reveal private genetic information about the donor. We propose practical measures including chimerism-informed molecular review, standardized laboratory report annotation, contextual variant interpretation, and clear donor-notification pathways to help ensure potential donor-origin findings are recognized, interpreted and managed appropriately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsharawi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: