Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The primary objective of this observational study was to characterize the regional distribution of cadmium (Cd) in cacao-growing soils and beans and to identify soil properties associated with extractable Cd and plant accumulation. A secondary exploratory objective was to describe clone-related patterns at intentionally selected high-risk farms. Sampling was conducted in two phases during 2020–2021. Phase 1 included 143 farms across eight Soil Cartographic Units (SCUs), where pseudo-total and DTPA-extractable soil Cd, soil chemical properties, and bean Cd were evaluated at the farm-plot scale. Phase 2 included seven farms intentionally selected because bean Cd exceeded 1.0 mg kg −1 . The Phase 2 analytical dataset comprised 23 tree-level observations (13 CCN-51 and 10 ICS-95); both clones co-occurred in four farms, which provided the independent pairs for exploratory clone comparisons. Pseudo-total soil Cd differed among SCUs, whereas DTPA-extractable Cd did not show significant SCU-level differences. Soil pH, Ca, Mg, P, and Zn were associated with soil Cd fractions and bean accumulation. Median bean Cd was 0.404 mg kg −1 , and 20.0% of samples were above the 0.6 mg kg −1 screening benchmark derived from the EU maximum level for certain cocoa products; this comparison does not establish compliance of processed products. Leiva showed the highest regional values. Farm-level paired analyses in Phase 2 did not support a statistically robust clone effect on litter, leaf, or bean Cd. These findings provide a regional Cd baseline and a scale-explicit framework for integrating soil mapping, soil chemistry, plant tissues, and exploratory within-farm clone comparisons in heterogeneous cacao landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lerma-Lasso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: