Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relative influence of tectonics and climate on the long-term evolution of Himalayan river systems remains debated. We investigated the Sutlej River, a major snow-fed tributary of the Indus River at its exit from the Himalayan Front. Using an integrated dataset of geomorphic mapping, subsurface stratigraphy, and Optically Stimulated Luminescence geochronology, we identify a previously misidentified uplifted surface (the Ropar Surface), abandoned paleovalleys and fluvial terraces. Our results show that the Sutlej River on long-timescales occupied multiple flow strands, including a west and a south-flowing strand. This drainage configuration was forced by tectonic uplift along a transverse structural zone linking segments of the Main Frontal Thrust. Notably, this drainage reorganization occurred through river bifurcation and avulsion between >60 and 15 ka—significantly predating the mid-Holocene collapse of the Harappan Civilization. These findings indicate that abandonment of the paleo-Sutlej was a prolonged tectonically controlled process rather than a short-lived climate-driven event, thereby querying existing models of Himalayan river network reorganization in the mountain to foreland transition zone that emphasised climate driven processes. Sutlej River occupied a west and a south-flowing strand with the drainage reorganization occurring through river bifurcation and avulsion between <60 and 15 ka through a tectonically controlled process, as shown using optically stimulated luminescence geochronology and sedimentary, structural and geomorphic analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: