Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With growing populations of cancer survivors (CS), late effects of cancer treatments have emerged as a public health concern. Cancer treatments could be associated with aging-related biological alterations. However, findings remain sparse. This systematic review (SR) aims to synthesize evidence on biological and epigenetic markers of aging-related alterations in CS compared with cancer-free controls. This SR was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for observational studies comparing biological and epigenetic biomarkers of aging-related processes between CS and cancer-free controls. Eligible biomarkers covered biological processes implicated in aging mechanisms. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes, expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD), and heterogeneity was assessed (I²). Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE for exposure questions. Among 11,007 screened references, 22 studies were included. Studies were mainly cross-sectional and retrospective, with sample sizes ranging from 21 to 21,144, including mainly childhood ( n = 9) and breast cancer populations ( n = 8). The most frequently investigated aging-related biomarker domains included inflammatory processes ( n = 9), followed by epigenetic age measures ( n = 7), immune activation ( n = 2), and DNA damage ( n = 2). Meta-analyses identified significantly higher (hs)CRP levels in CS versus cancer-free controls (k = 7; 6 independent cohorts; n = 15,544; SMD = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.01–2.11; p-value = 0.049; I² = 97.7%) and higher epigenetic age-acceleration estimates in an exploratory clock-level synthesis (3 independent cohorts; 7 clock-specific estimates; SMD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13–0.50; p-value = 0.006; I²=84.2%). In a cohort-level sensitivity analysis restricted to the Horvath clock, the pooled estimate remained positive but not significant (3 cohorts; SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.35–0.78; p-value = 0.24; I²=68.4%). Consistent patterns emerged across analyses by treatment and life-stage at cancer. GRADE certainty was moderate for CD4⁺ naïve T-cell depletion and low for all other pooled outcomes. Cancer survivors appear to exhibit aging-related biological alterations, including elevated systemic inflammation, higher epigenetic age-acceleration estimates, and immune remodeling. These findings are compatible with the accelerated-aging hypothesis but do not demonstrate a faster aging trajectory, given the heterogeneity and predominantly cross-sectional designs. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether these alterations reflect an increased rate of biological aging over time and translate into clinical aging outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
FASTRÉ et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: