Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate postmortem interval (PMI) estimation remains a major challenge in forensic medicine. Here, we tested whether full-length 16S rRNA gene profiles of internal organs add predictive information to untargeted LC−MS/MS metabolomics for PMI estimation in rats. Metabolomics-only, microbiome-only, early-fusion, and stacking models were compared under leakage-controlled leave-one-animal-out (LOAO) validation, with parsimonious fixed-K models selecting the top 10 metabolites and top 5 microbial features within each training partition. 16S amplification failed in all 30 day-0 and 25 of 30 day-1 internal-organ samples, in both the full-length assay and an independent V3−V4 assay, indicating that the microbial signal of internal organs is effectively undetectable in the first 0−24 h; modelling therefore covered a 2−7 day window. Metabolomic profiles tracked PMI closely (LOAO RMSE 0.467−0.677 days across tissues), whereas microbiome-only models yielded substantially higher RMSEs than the metabolomics models, although their point estimates remained below the intercept-only baseline (RMSE approximately 2.0 days). The added value of multi-omics integration was limited and tissue dependent: stacking yielded a significantly lower RMSE than metabolomics alone only in the spleen after within-tissue correction, and this difference did not remain significant after correction across the full set of comparisons. All performance estimates are internal, derived from a single cohort without independent validation, and no forensic applicability is claimed; confirmation in independent animal cohorts, broader environmental conditions, and ultimately human forensic samples is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: