Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To address the limited scope for active stiffness regulation in conventional fabric-reinforced rubber tubes, this study proposed a rubber tube reinforced with shape memory alloy (SMA)/bio-based polyamide 56 (PA56) hybrid cords and investigated its torsional response and energy-dissipation characteristics under electro-thermo-mechanical coupling. Seven interfacial treatment routes were compared using H-pull-out tests. The selected combination of surface deoxidation, PA56 hybrid twisting, and 6150/KJ-252 coating achieved a peak pull-out load of 79.7 N and was used in tube fabrication. Tubes with different hybrid ratios and cord laying angles were fabricated, and hybrid-cord tensile tests and tube torsion tests characterized the reinforcement and structural responses before and after electrothermal activation. The martensite-to-austenite transformation of the SMA increased the torsional stiffness of the hybrid structure. Among the tested cord laying angles of 30°, 45°, and 60°, the 45° configuration exhibited the highest initial torsional stiffness, consistent with cord alignment with the principal tensile-strain direction under pure torsion. The activated 1:1 hybrid configuration at 45° exhibited an 82.3% enhancement in torsional stiffness relative to the pure-PA56 reference. The 45° configuration also exhibited the highest relative energy-dissipation ratio in the tested angle comparisons, whereas electrothermal activation increased initial torsional stiffness while decreasing the relative energy-dissipation ratio. These results link interfacial treatment selection to the combined evaluation of stiffness and energy dissipation in unpressurized straight rubber tubes, providing a basis for selecting cord laying angles and activation states in actively tunable rubber structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: