Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Phase imaging applications such as QSM are highly sensitive to noise amplifications, phase singularities, and other artefacts, particularly in challenging scenarios such as ultra-high field (7 T), under-sampled or single-echo acquisitions. We present a novel image reconstruction method, MORSE-PI, designed to produce high-SNR, artefact-free, and singularity-free phase images for both structural (SWI, QSM) and functional (fQSM) phase-based brain imaging. Methods MORSE-PI extends our previous approach, MORSE, by introducing a Virtual Reference Coil (VRC). The VRC is constructed as a linear combination of coil sensitivity maps, with correlations enhanced between coil elements using the noise covariance matrix. Such a VRC ensures robust signal support across the entire brain and is used to correct phase offsets in the MORSE-derived coil sensitivity estimates, resulting in artefact-free, high-SNR phase. Results Compared to GRAPPA with ASPIRE phase correction, MORSE-PI demonstrates greater robustness to artefacts such as noise amplification and aliasing, and shows improved reproducibility in structural imaging at both 3 T and 7 T. Unlike ESPIRiT and GRAPPA combined with adaptive coil combination methods, MORSE-PI yields singularity-free phase maps. MORSE-PI enables high-SNR reconstructions even for the most challenging scenarios, such as single-echo EPI at 7 T. Its efficient, containerised implementation using the Gadgetron framework supports deployment on the MRI scanner console during measurements. Conclusion MORSE-PI offers a flexible and computationally efficient solution for generating high-SNR, artefact- and singularity-free phase images in both single- and multi-echo GRE and EPI acquisitions. This makes it particularly well-suited for structural and functional QSM, as well as other phase-based MRI applications. Its robustness and rapid computational time facilitate efficient deployment on scanners across field strengths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dymerska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: