Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multi-agent simulation supports occupant behavior analyses in static buildings, but rarely extends to dynamically reconfigurable environments, preventing pre-deployment evaluation of human-building interactions. This paper introduces a narrative-based framework modeling occupants and adaptive architectural systems as agents, positioning buildings as active participants rather than passive containers. A narrative formalism coordinates human and spatial agents, a visual scripting interface enables non-experts to author interaction scenarios, and modular components aim to foster usability and transfer across spatial contexts and interaction types. An exploratory, early-stage evaluation with novice architects in an academic setting modeled eight scenarios spanning multiple spatial scales and four adaptive component types using a shared component library, indicating the framework supports simulations across spatial contexts and adaptation types. Survey responses ( n = 25) suggest participants perceived it as valuable, transferable, and supportive of complex interaction scenarios. An exploratory between-cohort comparison links reduced visual scripting node counts to improved perceived template support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davide Schaumann (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: