Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stakeholder involvement, project performance, and service delivery are usually studied as links in a presumed causal chain, but their joint structure, the alternatives to the chain, and the agreement between project-level and portfolio-level evidence are rarely examined. This study analyzes the three constructs as a system in Kenya's water flagship projects.Survey data from 208 usable questionnaires (65.62% response; stratified sample of 317 of 1,804 projects) were analyzed with partial correlations, maximum-likelihood fit of competing three-variable structures with information criteria, Monte Carlo mediation, dominance and commonality analysis, a Gaussian conditional-independence graph for the four constructs including tendering strategy, and a comparison with recorded annual performance and service delivery indices (2015-2019; n = 5) using correlations, first differences, lags, gap series, and a domain cross-correlation matrix. With tendering strategy added, involvement became a leaf of the conditional-independence graph: its partial correlations with performance (-.031) and service delivery (-.014) were non-significant, and only its link to tendering (.451) survived. Project-level coherence did not simply reappear in time: the recorded composites correlated r = .784 over five years (95% CI -.32 to .98), but their year-to-year changes were negatively related (r = -.67; n = 4), service delivery overtook performance in 2018 (gap +8.4 points), and time and quality performance, not cost, tracked service delivery (r = .69 to .94 against -.01 to .43).The study provides the first system-level account of involvement, performance, and service delivery in Kenya's water flagship projects, shows which structural claims the data can and cannot support, and demonstrates that cross-sectional and temporal coherence are distinct and partly divergent, which cautions against using cross-sectional associations to forecast portfolio dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meijo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: