Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Increased transmission of avian influenza from animals to humans has elevated the risk of an H5 pandemic. Methods This phase 2, randomized, observer-blind, multi-center trial assessed the immunogenicity and safety of homologous priming with an MF59-adjuvanted, cell-based H5N8 A/Astrakhan/3212/2020 clade 2.3.4.4b vaccine (aH5N8c). We enrolled adults age ≥18 years, equally stratified into 18–64 (including a poultry-worker subset) and ≥65 year cohorts. Primary and secondary outcomes were homologous antibody responses against H5N8 measured in all participants by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and in a subset by microneutralization (MN) assays on Days 1, 22, and 43. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were monitored for 7 days post-vaccination, with unsolicited AEs tracked throughout Day 43. Results 239 participants were vaccinated (18–64 years, n = 121; ≥65 years, n = 118). At Day 43 (21 days post second aH5N8c dose), geometric mean fold increases (GMFI) were 13.7 for the 18–64 cohort and 10.2 for the ≥65 cohort. HI seroconversion rates were 75.8% (95% CI 66.1–83.8%) for the 18–64 cohort and 71.0% (61.1–79.6%) for the ≥65 cohort. HI titers ≥1:40 were achieved in 75.8% (66.1–83.8%) and 73.0% (63.2–81.4%) of participants, respectively. MN seroconversion rates were 80.6% (68.6–89.6%) and 70.0% (56.8–81.2%), while MN titers ≥1:40 were 83.9% (72.3–92.0%) and 86.7% (75.4–94.1%), respectively. No notable differences in immune responses by poultry worker status were observed. Most solicited AEs were mild or moderate, resolving within 3 days. Unsolicited AEs were reported by 16.7% participants by Day 43. Conclusion These data support the use of the MF59-adjuvanted, cell-based monovalent H5N8 vaccine as a public health intervention against H5 influenza.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brosz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: