Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The study evaluates contrast-associated acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease progression, and dialysis requirement in intensive care (ICU) patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Methods: prospective observational cohort study included 112 patients with baseline eGFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m² who underwent one or two intravascular contrast administrations. Renal outcomes were assessed for 6 months. Results: Single exposure group (62 patients) versus 50 in repeated exposure group. No statistical significance difference was found between both groups for CA-AKI incidence after the first exposure (25.8% vs. 25%, p=0.8) or in CKD progression and dialysis initiation at 3 and 6 months (p>0.5). CA-AKI incidence after the second exposure was 64%. Prior CA‑AKI predicts subsequent CA‑AKI (OR 11.63, p=0.02) and CKD progression at six months in both single (OR 5.29, p=0.008) and repeated exposure groups (OR 10.36, p=0.001). Creatinine increased significantly from 1 to 3 months (p=0.002 and 0.03 for single and multiple exposures) and continued rising at 6 months (p=0.003 and p<0.0001). In the repeated‑exposure group, baseline CKD stage independently predicted progression at 3 (OR 0.36, p=0.02) and 6 months (OR 0.55, p=0.05). Across CKD stages (2–5), renal outcomes did not differ between exposure groups, though all CKD stage 5 patients developed CA‑AKI after the second contrast. CKD progression at six months was significantly more common with cumulative contrast volumes >100 ml (p=0.047). Mehran score underestimated AKI risk (26% predicted vs. 64% observed) after the 2nd exposure and the need for dialysis (1.09% predicted vs. 6.45% observed). Conclusions: Early post‑contrast kidney response helps identify high‑risk patients before re‑imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: