Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the distribution of benefits from inbound tourism across sectors, factors, and institution in Indonesia from 1995 to 2016 using a social accounting matrix framework. The financial contribution of inbound tourism to the Indonesian economy grew significantly between 1995 and 2016, yet remained vulnerable to monetary and sociopolitical crises. The closed-loop, or feedback, effect is the largest decomposed multiplier of inbound tourism (between 48 and 57%), indicating a significant contribution to labor and households. Clerical, sales, and service workers benefited the most (42–52%), particularly paid workers in the urban segment (20–24%). A higher proportion of tourism benefits is distributed to urban households (47–70%), with a significant gap between low-income households (23–27%) and high-income households (22–46%). Rural households receive 20–31% of the benefit, with a relatively small disparity between low-income households (8–17%) and high-income households (9–15%). Agricultural households receive 11–27% of the benefit, with agri-entrepreneur families receiving 9–22%, whereas the farm worker group receives the least among labor segments (2–6%). Overall, inbound tourism distributional welfare favors service-related workers and households in urban areas, though it widens the disparity between low- and high-income groups. Future work can be pursued in other developing economies, thereby enabling a wider comparative analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiku et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: