Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study adopted a person‐centered approach to identify profiles of relationship mindfulness at individual and couple levels and examine their associations with personal and relational well‐being, demographic characteristics, and responses to couple relationship education (CRE). Using 1181 different‐gender couples, latent profile analyses identified three individual profiles (high, average, and low) and two dyadic profiles (generally high and discrepantly low). Across both levels, profiles were primarily distinguished by overall levels. Individuals and couples in the high‐mindfulness profiles reported the highest well‐being, whereas those in the low‐mindfulness profiles showed the lowest. Gender and parental status were significantly related to profile membership. Couples in the discrepantly low mindfulness profile showed greater improvements in well‐being following CRE than those in the generally high profile. Overall, the findings suggest that relationship mindfulness acts as a relatively unified construct within individuals, and partners tend to show broad concordance in their overall levels of relationship mindfulness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: