Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines whether the January 2024 removal of stock-price floors improved short-run price discovery and reduced price rigidity in the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). An event-study technique was applied to 338 securities: 306 firms in the main removal cohort, 20 firms in the second-stage cohort, and 12 firms that retained their floors. Market-adjusted abnormal returns were used as the primary specification, while a market model and complete-window samples were used for robustness. Cross-sectional one-sample t-tests assessed abnormal returns, paired-sample t-tests compared pre- and post-removal zero-return rates and intraday high-low ranges, and Welch tests compared treatment cohorts with the retained-floor benchmark. The main cohort recorded a cumulative average abnormal return (CAAR) of -6.77% over [-5, +5], while the second-stage cohort recorded -18.87% over [-3, +3]. Zero-return rates fell from 49.84% to 5.36% in the main cohort and from 97.85% to 3.50% in the second-stage cohort, while intraday ranges increased significantly. The findings are robust for the shorter event windows but sensitive to sample completeness over the longest window. Abnormal returns, zero-return frequency, and the high-low range are proxy indicators rather than comprehensive measures of market efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: