Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large-scale intelligent surveillance applications impose increasing pressure on edge–cloud infrastructures because continuous high-resolution video must share limited uplink bandwidth and edge compute resources. We present an edge–cloud video-analytics prototype that moves spatial cropping and discrete temporal sampling into the Direct Memory Access (DMA) path of a custom Video Processing Unit (VPU), followed by hardware H.264 encoding and cloud-side YOLOv8 inference. We re-evaluate the pipeline on four MOT16 training sequences using fixed-quantization (CQP) encoding and an explicitly defined person-detection AP50 protocol. Temporal sampling reduces payload by 66.09% on average, while macro AP50 changes from 0.6029 to 0.5154; the per-scene AP50 change ranges from −0.0247 to −0.2122. A fixed crop is substantially less robust, with a macro AP50 decrease of 0.1795 and severe failures on MOT16-04 and MOT16-10. On MOT16-04, the joint crop-and-sample configuration reduces payload by 81.05% but lowers AP50 from 0.6263 to 0.1792. An archived software–VPU timing pair shows a 97.49% reduction in process CPU time (72.697 to 1.827 s), although wall time increases from 6.600 to 8.799 s; a current full-frame run consumes 9.0% of one logical CPU. Active two- and eight-card tests expose a shared DMA-mapping failure rather than linear scaling. These measurements establish both the bandwidth benefit and the scene-, motion-, and driver-dependent boundaries of the current prototype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: