Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CAR T-cell therapy has moved from a late-line option to an earlier treatment platform for selected patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. This narrative review summarizes the 2026 evidence base for approved BCMA-directed products, long-term outcomes, real-world reproducibility, toxicity, sequencing, special populations and emerging platforms. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is approved after at least one prior line in lenalidomide-refractory disease and is supported by progression-free and overall survival benefit in CARTITUDE-4 and by 5-year CARTITUDE-1 follow-up showing multiyear treatment-free control in a subset of patients. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) remains a validated option for selected patients after at least two prior lines, supported by KarMMa-3 and real-world data. Safety assessment must extend beyond CRS and ICANS to delayed neurotoxicity, ICAHT, infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, IEC-enterocolitis, IEC-HS and secondary T-cell malignancy surveillance. Post-BCMA relapse requires phenotype-based restaging and careful sequencing with BCMA- and non-BCMA-directed agents. Emerging strategies, including GPRC5D-directed CAR T cells, anito-cel, AZD0120/GC012F, allogeneic and in vivo platforms, are promising but remain evidence-level dependent. The review emphasizes risk-adapted monitoring and implementation priorities for Polish centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Legiec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: