Key result
Additive preoperative risk score reliably predicts perioperative mortality and major morbidity after CABG.
Why the study?
The study aimed to relate morbidity and mortality risk to preoperative severity of illness in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Do preoperative severity of illness factors and an additive clinical risk score predict perioperative morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Cohort (n=9,120)
No
Do preoperative severity of illness factors and an additive clinical risk score predict perioperative morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?
Provides a validated preoperative clinical scoring system and logistic regression models to accurately estimate both perioperative morbidity and mortality risks in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports additive preoperative scoring for CABG risk estimation; leaves open external validation before routine adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To relate morbidity and mortality risk to preoperative severity of illness in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 5051 patients using univariate and logistic regression to identify risk factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality. Prospective application of models to a subsequent 2-year validation cohort (n = 4069). SETTING: Cleveland Clinic Foundation. PATIENTS: All adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery between July 1, 1986, and June 30, 1988 (reference group), and July 1, 1988, and June 30, 1990 (validation group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and morbidity (myocardial infarction and use of intra-aortic balloon pump, mechanical ventilation for 3 or more days, neurological deficit, oliguric or anuric renal failure, or serious infection). MAIN RESULTS: Emergency procedure, preoperative serum creatinine levels of greater than 168 mumol/L, severe left ventricular dysfunction, preoperative hematocrit of 0.34, increasing age, chronic pulmonary disease, prior vascular surgery, reoperation, and mitral valve insufficiency were found to be predictive of mortality. In addition to these factors, diabetes mellitus, body weight of 65 kg or less [corrected], aortic stenosis, and cerebrovascular disease were predictive of morbidity. Logistic regression equations were developed, and a simple additive score for clinical use was designed by allocating each of these risk-factor values of 1 to 6 points. Both methods predict mortality. Increased morbidity was demonstrated with increases in score. CONCLUSIONS: The logistic or clinical models developed are superior to the currently available methods for comparing mortality outcome and provide previously unavailable information on morbidity based on preoperative status. The clinical scoring system is useful for preoperative estimates of morbidity and mortality risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas L. Higgins (1992) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery bypass grafting (n=9,120). Preoperative severity of illness and clinical risk scoring system (1 to 6 points per risk factor) was evaluated on Perioperative mortality and morbidity (myocardial infarction and use of intra-aortic balloon pump, mechanical ventilation for 3 or more days, neurological deficit, oliguric or anuric renal failure, or serious infection). Preoperative risk factors allocated 1 to 6 points in an additive clinical score predicted CABG mortality and morbidity across 9,120 patients (5,051 derivation, 4,069 validation).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: