Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This paper reviews and critiques the positive accounting literature following publication of Watts and Zimmerman (1978, 1979). The 1978 paper helped generate the positive accounting literature which offers an explanation of accounting practice, suggests the importance of contracting costs, and has led to the discovery of some previously unknown empirical regularities. The 1979 paper produced a methodological debate that has not been very productive. This paper attempts to remove some common misconceptions about methodology that surfaced in the debate. It also suggests ways to improve positive research in accounting choice. The most important of these improvements is tighter links between the theory and the empirical tests. A second suggested improvement is the development of models that recognize the endogeneity among the variables in the regressions. A third improvement is reduction in measurement errors in both the dependent and independent variables in the regressions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ross L. Watts
Jerold L. Zimmerman
The Accounting Review
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
University of Rochester
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Watts et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff8d764716aad0cc85628c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-9603274032