Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Responding to a need for a guide for conducting Official Method validation studies of microbiological methods, AOAC utilized the experience of three microbiologists who have been active in the field of method validation. In collaboration, a document was prepared which covered the following areas: terms and their definitions associated with the Official Methods program (e.g., reference methods, alternative methods, and ruggedness testing), protocols and validation requirements for qualitative methods versus those for quantitative methods, the concept of the precollaborative study, ruggedness testing, tests for significant differences, performance indicators, and the approval process. After its preparation, this document was reviewed by the members of the Methods Committee on Microbiology and Extraneous Materials and by members of the Official Methods Board. Herein is presented the approved version of that document.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Philip T Feldsine
Bellevue Hospital Center
Carlos Abeyta
University of New Mexico Hospital
Wallace H Andrews
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
Journal of AOAC International
United States Food and Drug Administration
Bellevue Hospital Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Feldsine et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df0f583b0ba53fb37a107e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/85.5.1187