Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The primary success rate and incidence of major complications have been retrospectively assessed in a consecutive series of 224 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in one centre. The patients have been divided into three groups; those with angina and no previous myocardial infarction (Group 1; N = 130), those with angina and a previous transmural myocardial infarction (TMI) (Group 2; N = 59), and those with angina and a previous non-transmural myocardial infarction (NTMI) (Group 3; N = 26). The three groups were well matched for age, gender and angiographic severity of stenosis. The primary success rate in Group 1 was 90% compared to 64% in Group 2. The success rate in Group 3 lay in between at 77%. The lower success rates in Groups 2 and 3 were mainly due to an increase in the frequency of major complications. Acute coronary occlusion occurred in seven patients in Group 1, nine patients in Group 2 and four patients in Group 3. In all these patients in Groups 2 and 3 the outcome of acute occlusion was a procedure-related clinical myocardial infarction despite immediate re-angioplasty and/or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting whereas only four patients in Group 1 sustained an acute infarct. In this series of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for symptom limiting angina, previous myocardial infarction appears to be a risk factor for a lower success rate mainly due to an increase in the frequency and severity of major complications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Perry et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2024563224f8dacd0df356 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062388
R A Perry
Carilion Clinic
Ashok Seth
Madurai Medical College
Amolak Singh
University of Missouri
European Heart Journal
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: