Improved accuracy in coronary heart disease risk assessment necessitates a reevaluation of the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
The way we assess risk of coronary heart disease has become more accurate in recent years. How does this affect the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies?
Manuel et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Improved accuracy in coronary heart disease risk assessment necessitates a reevaluation of the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies.